Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Radical Islam

OED Definition
There are a number of definitions given for the word Radical but the following are the senses in which it is used to describe Islam.
a. Relating to or forming the root, basis, or foundation of something; original, primary.
b. Politics. Advocating thorough or far-reaching political or social reform; representing or supporting an extreme section of a party
c. Characterized by independence of or departure from what is usual or traditional; progressive, unorthodox, or innovative in outlook, conception, design, etc.

According to Daniel L. Byman of the Brookings Institute, the term “Radical Islam” is problematic because it is “so big as to be confusing, meaningless, or even contradictory.” [1] He goes on to give three different definitions that are currently in vogue, which we have paraphrased in the following list.
1) Radical Islam means peaceful Islamic movements based on achieving complete political and social reform.
2) Radical means violent but not necessarily towards the United States. [2]
3) Radical means violent AND anti-United States.

Byman is right to point out that the term “Radical Islam” can be used in ways that are contradictory. In fact, we see some of the contradictions in his three-pronged definition. A Radical Islam that is driven towards achieving complete social and political reform through peaceful means is necessarily different and incompatible with a Radical Islam that uses violence as its modus operandi. Similarly, a Radical Islam that is hostile towards the West is necessarily different from one that is not. So even before diving into our analysis, we have already identified the issues of inconsistency and meaninglessness as being potential pitfalls for journalists using the word in their output.

How this term should be used

In light of the above, we recommend that the term “Radical Islam” be avoided in journalistic output, and instead the specific movement or ideology that is being discussed be mentioned.

“Radical Islam” – at least in the British Press – is used predominantly to refer to terrorism (similarly to the term “de-radicalise”), which is problematic for two main reasons:

  1. The association of Islam with terrorism leads the reader to assume something inherently violent about Islam and allows those acting in bad faith to use the term “Radical Islam” as a dog whistle to spread fear of Muslims.
  2. It sometimes is used to mean “peaceful religiopolitical movements” which are “radical” (albeit non-violent) and this will not be understood.

Furthermore, proponents of the term claim the term “radical” in “radical Islam” distinguishes it from “moderate Islam”, which is peaceful. This binary framing of Islam as either moderate or radical, is culturally loaded and unnuanced – and this lack of recognition of the complexity of people and faiths, is not in tune with the reality of the world we live in.

Statistical Trends

In the News on the Web corpus, a search for the term “Radical Islam” yields 4597 results. To put this into context, the term yields more results than Islamism (3311), Islamic Extremism (3171) and Islamic Fundamentalism (1213).

If we narrow our search to include results only from the British press, however, we find that it yields 666 results, fewer than Islamism (726), but more than Islamic Extremism (596) and Islamic Fundamentalism (195).

These figures show us that the term is used much more frequently vis a vis its proposed alternatives outside of Britain than it is inside. Of particular interest are the statistics from the USA, which show us that the term Radical Islam is roughly twice as popular as the terms, “Islamism” and “Islamic extremism”, and about seven times as popular as the term Islamic fundamentalism. [3]

Usage in Context

When searching for the term “Radical Islam” within the British Press, a contextual reading of the first 100 hits (out of a total of 666) led to the following results:

  • In 76 out of the articles analysed, the term “Radical Islam” was being used in relation to terrorism.
  • In 20 of the articles, the use of the term “Radical Islam” was too vague for us to make a judgment as to what precisely was being meant by the writer.
  • In 3 articles, the distinction between Radical Islam as “peaceful Islamic movements based on complete political and social reform,” and Radical Islam as violent extremism was attempted
  • In one article, the term was used satirically

Below are a handful of examples of how Radical Islam is used to refer to terrorism:

Example 1:

Country/date  GB (19-09-24) 
Title  MPs must find some honour and integrity and rule out No … 
Source  https://www.thenational.scot/politics/17817524.mps-must-find-honour-integrity-rule-no-deal/  

 

Excerpt:  

It is certain that the UK is dying, for when the UK state itself has, by cruel policy, killed hundreds of thousands over the last several years, while radical Islam hasn’t even managed hundreds.  

 Example 2

Country/date  GB (19-05-12) 
Title  Revealed: British spies KNEW who Jihadi John was within hours of his … 
Source  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7019939/British-spies-identified-Jihadi-John-hours-beheading-video-veins-knife-hand.html  

 

Excerpt:  

The university has since been linked with several proponents of radical Islam, and Emwazi appeared to have fallen under their sway. He began attending different mosques and was known to associate with Bilal el-Berjawi, who was killed by a drone strike in Somalia three years ago.  

Example 3:
. 

Country/date  GB (19-05-22) 
Title  Revealed: John Walker Lindh said in 2015 ISIS was ‘doing a … 
Source  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7060729/John-Walker-Lindh-said-ISIS-doing-spectacular-job-beheading-journalist-James-Foley.html 

 

Excerpt: 

He said there’s little research to indicate the efficacy of de-radicalizing inmates with connections to radical Islam, but he said the research shows that recidivism rates for those connected to white supremacy and other forms of extremism are high.  

As different to “terrorism” in ways that aren’t explained 

Example 4:

Country/date  GB (17-05-12) 
Title  The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam by … 
Source  https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/saturday-review/the-strange-death-of-europe-immigration-identity-islam-by-douglas-murray-bffq3tdtf  

 

Excerpt: 

Douglas Murray builds a persuasive case, reaching back to the 1980s controversy over Ray Honeyford, the Bradford headmaster who was accused of racism after writing an article criticising multicultural education policies. Though stormy, that episode now seems, in an era of throat-cuttings and suicide bombings, almost as quaint as a rerun of Passport to Pimlico. Well-meaning but misguided politicians and opinion-formers, Murray argues, underestimated the appeal of radical Islam and allowed extremism to take hold in some communities.  

 Example 5:

Country/date  GB (19-04-24) 
Title  Hotel bombers were privately educated sons of millionaire 
Source  https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hotel-bombers-were-privately-educated-sons-of-millionaire-22fdlftvt 

Excerpt: 

The two brothers who bombed luxury hotels on Sunday, killing dozens of tourists at breakfast in Colombo, enjoyed a privileged lifestyle before turning to radicalIslam and jihad.  Sons of a millionaire spice trader, Inshaf and Ilham Ibrahim were privately educated in the Sri Lankan capital.  

Future research: 

It would be valuable to understand the results of a poll question to the British public asking: “What is the first word that comes to your mind when you see the term “Radical Islam””.  

Appendix:  Worldwide and Great British Corpus 

Worldwide Corpus 

If we search the root word “Islam” on the News on the Web Corpus for collocates, the following are the top fifty results (as sorted by percentage) in the table below. The word “Radical” is ranked 14th on the list. 

NB: The All tab refers to the number of times the word in question appears in the corpus. So, if we look at “Radical”, it occurs exactly 158703 times in the NOW database. The Frequency tab refers to the number of times the word in question occurs within five words (on the left or the right) of the word “Islam”. Taking “Radical” once more, we can see that the number of times it occurs within five words of “Islam” in the corpus is 5490. This means that 3.46% of all usages of the word “Radical” are in relation to the word “Islam”, thus yielding a moderately high Mutual Information score of 6.98.  

For the purpose of this analysis, we have removed results in which the word Islam occurs as either a first name or a surname. 

 

 

 

  Freq     All   %   MI  
1     HOLIEST  1789     6588   27.16   9.95  
2     JUDAISM  1761     14143   12.45   8.82  
3     CHRISTIANITY  5597     51440   10.88   8.63  
4     HINDUISM  1332     17562   7.58   8.11  
5     TEACHINGS  2810     37973   7.4   8.07  
6     TENETS  1216     19574   6.21   7.82  
7     FUNDAMENTALIST  631     12435   5.07   7.53  
8     SUNNI  2043     41634   4.91   7.48  
9     CONVERTED  6315     152894   4.13   7.23  
10     PARTI  635     17397   3.65   7.05  
11     CONVERTS  722     19928   3.62   7.04  
12     PROPHET  2431     67559   3.6   7.03  
13     CONVERT  3901     110047   3.54   7.01  
14     RADICAL  5490     158703   3.46   6.98  
15     BUDDHISM  805     23335   3.45   6.97  
16     NON-MUSLIMS  529     16467   3.21   6.87  
17     RELIGIONS  1828     57945   3.15   6.84  
18     BNP  1818     58613   3.1   6.82  
19     INSULTING  1465     48215   3.04   6.79  
20     MALAYS  617     21705   2.84   6.69  
21     SHIA  850     30743   2.76   6.65  
22     CONVERTING  1311     48901   2.68   6.61  
23     SHIITE  568     21565   2.63   6.58  
24     ISLAM  5288     239568   2.21   6.33  
25     QURAN  661     30118   2.19   6.32  
26     INTERPRETATIONS  543     24956   2.18   6.31  
27     SECT  579     28888   2   6.19  
28     MUSLIMS  6506     334553   1.94   6.14  
29     FORBIDDEN  754     39158   1.93   6.13  
30     INTERPRETATION  1887     100551   1.88   6.09  
31     PILLARS  1139     61591   1.85   6.07  
32     JIHAD  539     30727   1.75   6  
33     CONVERSION  1767     127487   1.39   5.66  
34     PAS  754     59750   1.26   5.52  
35     TEACHES  913     73762   1.24   5.49  
36     EXTREMIST  714     68978   1.04   5.23  
37     MODERATE  1671     163785   1.02   5.21  
38     EMBRACED  869     85836   1.01   5.2  
39     MALAY  563     57681   0.98   5.15  
40     ALLAH  626     71888   0.87   4.99  
41     ENEMIES  1156     138233   0.84   4.93  
42     IDEOLOGY  808     95658   0.84   4.94  
43     MILITANT  934     113929   0.82   4.9  
44     MUHAMMAD  1494     185975   0.8   4.87  
45     MOSQUE  983     130053   0.76   4.78  
46     EXTREMISM  539     72194   0.75   4.76  
47     DHAKA  824     121884   0.68   4.62  
48     MUSLIM  3308     513638   0.64   4.55  
49     FOLLOWERS  1230     191561   0.64   4.55  
50     HOLY  1354     217929   0.62   4.5 4 

 

Great Britain Corpus  

If we limit our search to include results only from the British Press, our results are in line with our previous findings. We can see that “Radical” is lower on the list in the British corpus than in the Worldwide corpus, further evidence that the term “Radical Islam” is more prevalent in media outside the UK (particularly America) than inside.   

 

1     WAHHABI  51     214   23.83   9.88  
2     HOLIEST  220     933   23.58   9.87  
3     JUDAISM  251     2074   12.1   8.91  
4     SALAFI  37     324   11.42   8.82  
5     HINDUISM  71     629   11.29   8.81  
6     CHRISTIANITY  552     7765   7.11   8.14  
7     PERVERSION  34     560   6.07   7.91  
8     FUNDAMENTALIST  93     1647   5.65   7.81  
9     TEACHINGS  138     2520   5.48   7.76  
10     SUFI  36     684   5.26   7.71  
11     SUNNI  281     5491   5.12   7.67  
12     ISLAMISM  36     726   4.96   7.62  
13     BUDDHISM  48     1225   3.92   7.28  
14     CONVERT  452     11740   3.85   7.25  
15     PROPHET  184     4807   3.83   7.25  
16     CONVERTED  700     18539   3.78   7.23  
17     SECT  80     2155   3.71   7.2  
18     OFFSHOOT  48     1342   3.58   7.15  
19     CONVERTING  169     5092   3.32   7.04  
20     CONVERTS  78     2424   3.22   7  
21     SHIA  177     6117   2.89   6.84  
22     INSULTING  167     5821   2.87   6.83  
23     RELIGIONS  125     4449   2.81   6.8  
24     RADICAL  756     27914   2.71   6.75  
25     SHIITE  34     1321   2.57   6.67  
26     RELIGION  630     29306   2.15   6.41  
27     KORAN  47     2182   2.15   6.42  
28     PILLARS  101     4911   2.06   6.35  
29     INCOMPATIBLE  53     2574   2.06   6.35  
30     UZBEKISTAN  35     1696   2.06   6.36  
31     MUSLIMS  562     27458   2.05   6.34  
32     INTERPRETATION  241     12168   1.98   6.3  
33     INTERPRETATIONS  58     2942   1.97   6.29  
34     ISLAM  372     19838   1.88   6.22  
35     SHARIA  60     3479   1.72   6.1  
36     MUHAMMAD  117     6872   1.7   6.08  
37     MILITANT  147     9213   1.6   5.98  
38     CATHOLICISM  34     2170   1.57   5.96  
39     MECCA  46     2991   1.54   5.93  
40     HARDLINE  50     3574   1.4   5.79  
41     JIHAD  41     3294   1.24   5.63  
42     FORBIDDEN  63     5251   1.2   5.57  
43     IDEOLOGY  95     8452   1.12   5.48  
44     FAITHS  39     3537   1.1   5.45  
45     TOLERANT  36     3431   1.05   5.38  
46     CONVERSION  121     11870   1.02   5.34  
47     EXTREMIST  93     9094   1.02   5.34  
48     PRACTISED  35     3426   1.02   5.34  
49     HATES  37     4169   0.89   5.14  
50     COMPATIBLE  55     6230   0.88   5.13